Date: 2005-08-27 09:11 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wispfox.livejournal.com
I presume you mean the way [livejournal.com profile] randysmith was using it, and not the way that [livejournal.com profile] australian_joe was? In which case, I'm highly amused. :)

I am also amused by being part of [livejournal.com profile] randysmith's harem, although in the definition he used it, that makes sense. :)

Date: 2005-08-28 02:13 am (UTC)
randysmith: (Default)
From: [personal profile] randysmith
I think [livejournal.com profile] wispfox's definition is even more liberal than mine, as I think at the time I wouldn't have been comfortable cuddling with either of you in public (and quite possibly the reverse). *Wanted* to, yes. But not yet comfortable.

Date: 2005-08-28 02:40 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wispfox.livejournal.com
Ah, see, my reply above is based on now, not then, since I was unaware if it then. :)

So, you are probably correct in that then (a few years ago?) I would also no have been comfortable cuddling with you. I don't think I knew you very well, if at all, a few years ago.

Date: 2005-08-29 09:41 pm (UTC)
randysmith: (Default)
From: [personal profile] randysmith
Arrggh; just realized I meant to say [livejournal.com profile] wolfkitn where instead I said [livejournal.com profile] wispfox. Darn W's :-}.

Date: 2005-08-30 02:28 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wispfox.livejournal.com
Odd. I totally read it the way you meant. :)

Date: 2005-08-28 02:14 am (UTC)
randysmith: (Default)
From: [personal profile] randysmith
And amusingly enough, my follow-on musings about what definition I was really using came from the internal feeling that I *wasn't* part of your harem, even though by the definition I was suggesting, I would be. So I wanted to track down what definition I was *really* using :-}.

Date: 2005-08-28 06:44 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wolfkitn.livejournal.com
hmmm. it's possible that i missed the "definitions" portion of things, simply by not being in the room at the time. i had been thinking that things had been "defined" on LJ, but now i'm thinking that this happened on friday night? in any event -- i have no idea what RS's or A_J's definitions of "harem" -are-, so there it is. *sigh* *shrug*

my own use of the term had to do with seeing two lovely young lasses fawning over [livejournal.com profile] randysmith and giggling and acting cute about it. that's all. the fact that he went on to get involved with one of them is, well, all that needs to be said in total. *grin*

Date: 2005-08-28 02:42 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wispfox.livejournal.com
Definitions happened Friday night, yes, but I explained what I thought they were in a later post. So you can go see! :)

my own use of the term had to do with seeing two lovely young lasses fawning over [info]randysmith and giggling and acting cute about it. that's all. the fact that he went on to get involved with one of them is, well, all that needs to be said in total. *grin*

Hee! Indeed. Not that I remember being giggly and acting cute (although fawning seems... odd), but I have no reason to believe I wasn't.

November 2024

S M T W T F S
     12
3 456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930

Most Popular Tags

Active Entries

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 25th, 2025 11:47 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios