Date: 2005-07-19 03:11 pm (UTC)
fraterrisus: A bald man in a tuxedo, grinning. (pantsless)
From: [personal profile] fraterrisus
Men were studied in the same way, but because it typically took only 20 seconds to reach ejaculation, it was difficult for neuroscientists to obtain and interpret data.

...

who ARE these people?!?!

Date: 2005-07-19 03:22 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wispfox.livejournal.com
I was _totally_ wondering that...

Date: 2005-07-19 03:25 pm (UTC)
bluepapercup: (Default)
From: [personal profile] bluepapercup
I don't know, but I think I slept with one of them once.

Date: 2005-07-19 03:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] moominmolly.livejournal.com
I think I read about this study elsewhere, and if I recall correctly, the problem is that for men, it was 20 seconds between the beginning and the end of the period they identified as "orgasm", and for women, this period was a minute. And, for some mumbletytechnological reason, their neurological snapshots could only effectively occur over a 30-second period -- meaning that their data for men got a lot of junk non-orgasm stuff in it.

Could be wrong, that's just what I remember.

Date: 2005-07-19 03:36 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] moominmolly.livejournal.com
Aha! Right theory, wrong time-frame: it was two minutes (http://www.news24.com/News24/Technology/News/0,,2-13-1443_1724457,00.html).

Date: 2005-07-19 03:39 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] moominmolly.livejournal.com
And another slightly different (http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2-2005280327,00.html) article.

Date: 2005-07-19 05:14 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wispfox.livejournal.com
Aaaaah. Neat! Thanks for the extra info. :)

Date: 2005-07-19 11:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] okoshun.livejournal.com
I had assumed that they were only interested in the act of orgasm causing ejaculation which for many (apparently most) men does not last as long as that of a woman.

I didn't think they meant the *whole* act.

Date: 2005-07-20 01:03 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nex0s.livejournal.com
I didn't think they meant the *whole* act

i hope not! @.@

n.

Date: 2005-07-20 04:06 am (UTC)
jasra: (fox)
From: [personal profile] jasra
Love the first link. Most amusing.

Interesting article too.

Date: 2005-07-21 05:33 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dietrich.livejournal.com
This totally surprised me:

Other differing brain patterns between the sexes suggested that men respond differently to having their genitals stimulated. Men appeared to want to rationalise the experience by interpreting its importance, while women merely enjoyed the sensation.

Wild. Wouldn't you think it would be the opposite, given the way men and women are generally socialized?

Date: 2005-07-25 04:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wispfox.livejournal.com
Yes... that's an interesting point!

I wonder if the rationalization part would not happen if they weren't being studied...

November 2024

S M T W T F S
     12
3 456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 17th, 2026 06:29 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios