wispfox: (tongue)
[personal profile] wispfox
I think I figured out why (other than just because I was being contrary) I don't have (or want) a harem by my definition, but the definitions used last night were ok (but good at making me blush furiously).

Harem, in my head, implies things like there being a lack of equality. And that I'm supporting them. And they are always around (that would be crowded). And that there is more defined relationship structure than there actually is in [livejournal.com profile] australian_joe's definition of such.

[livejournal.com profile] randysmith's definition is just funny. :) And, of course, the fact that I'm nearly certain that the definitions used were only used so that the word could be made to apply to me certainly caused me to have _reason_ to be contrary about it. In addition, the discussion was making me blush furiously, as I tend to have a difficult time with being made highly visible, even if in a good way and in a group of people I trust. (which probably contributed to the discussion continuing, since it's not as if I blush often)

[livejournal.com profile] australian_joe's definition was the group containing the people that I have kissed, where there is continued mutual interest in doing more than that (regardless of if it's likely that there will be more than that).

[livejournal.com profile] randysmith's definition, which I think no longer even vaguely approximates the original meaning, but was amusing in the 'dear god, I can't even enumerate that list" kind of way, was people I am comfortable cuddling in public. I think that contains pretty much everyone whose company I seek out in a social setting, and since I'm known to periodically have trouble keeping track of who I've not seen a while in that group, especially if they are local, I sure as hell can't enumerate it!

I think the funniest thing about this is that I _was_ actively trying to get everyone who fits [livejournal.com profile] australian_joe's definition, who would be around and known to be interested, at last night's Psinging. Because, dude, singing and many people I care about. What's _not_ to like?

Date: 2005-08-29 06:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wispfox.livejournal.com
"People with whom you often cuddle with in public as a group, when that group is joined by you"

... huh!

I think the only time you tend to see this is at Psinging, though, so your definition might even be "People with whom [livejournal.com profile] wispfox often cuddles with in a group at Psinging".

If you tended to sit still long enough at Psinging, you _would_ be in that group. I've most definitely cuddled with you at Psinging before! Or are you also requiring interconnections within that group which aren't solely with me? Because _that_ requirement shrinks the group quite a bit.

I also wonder how much of it has to do with the people that I specifically ask to be there (those who are in [livejournal.com profile] australian_joe's definition are definitely there. Other people might also be there). Huh.

Ok, ok, by some definition thereof, I have a harem.

Happy? ;)

November 2024

S M T W T F S
     12
3 456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 20th, 2026 03:07 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios