(no subject)
Feb. 18th, 2004 05:33 pmBefore I run home!
I really want a tactile and gustatorial fractal, with different sensations depending on the shape and color! Even better if there can be varying emotional flavorrs thrown in.
Want!
[edit: Or! Musical fractals!!!!!]
I really want a tactile and gustatorial fractal, with different sensations depending on the shape and color! Even better if there can be varying emotional flavorrs thrown in.
Want!
[edit: Or! Musical fractals!!!!!]
no subject
Date: 2004-02-18 10:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-02-18 10:57 pm (UTC)(Alas, after my rough home-sysadmin night/morning, I'm not fit dinner company, and anyway I need to get home to call Dreaming. But I am feeling awfully fractal.)
no subject
Date: 2004-02-19 12:04 am (UTC)Enjoy!
Mmm, tasty fractals
Date: 2004-02-19 01:12 am (UTC)Damn, now I need sushi.
Which generally yields an emotional flavor of "mmm, sushi" followed by a fish-induced coma.
Hmm.
Oh, right, I haven't actually "met" you. I just stumbled in here and saw a tactile, gustatorial fractile conversation and couldn't resist it. And then, clicking about, found the rest of your blog full of cool things to click on.
So I just added you. Hope that's ok with you. If not, just say so, and I shall sulk. And then defriend you.
no subject
Date: 2004-02-19 03:29 pm (UTC)No, I don't mind you adding me. Indeed, your blog was entertaining enough (and infrequent enough to not overwhelm me) that I added you back.
Sushi fractals? Hmm... that sounds interesting!
no subject
Date: 2004-02-19 03:29 pm (UTC)I thought I'd made it up. :)
no subject
Date: 2004-02-19 03:30 pm (UTC)The latter. I'm much more upfront about dinner inviting. :) I'm all fractal obsessed!
Also, I had a guest over last night. :)
Re:
Date: 2004-02-19 03:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-02-19 03:37 pm (UTC)But it doesn't seem to let you both listen *and* look. Which is sorta what I wanted. Hmm...
no subject
Date: 2004-02-19 03:39 pm (UTC)They're fractals, but as you could see from the fractal links I posted, not so much illustrating the things about fractals I like. Randomness and color variety, mostly. :)
no subject
Date: 2004-02-19 03:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-02-19 03:48 pm (UTC)It *doesn't* *fit*! Too long.
And I even removed the initial 'A' and the extraneous 'u' in 'colour', since it's spelled correctly either way, here.
It's *one* *letter* too long.
*grumbles*
Re:
Date: 2004-02-19 03:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-02-19 04:17 pm (UTC)I apparently completely misplaced the 3-D part of that description. Even with being able to make it '3-D', I'm actually 5 letters too long. If I include the 3-D part. :)
Re:
Date: 2004-02-19 04:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-02-19 04:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-02-19 04:27 pm (UTC)shnozzberry tirt: (n) A 3-D, multi-coloured, strange attractor.
no subject
Date: 2004-02-19 05:11 pm (UTC)Re:
Date: 2004-02-19 05:17 pm (UTC)Re:
Date: 2004-02-20 01:12 am (UTC)And I need a good blog to blog about.
no subject
Date: 2004-02-20 07:57 pm (UTC)Re: mmm, bloggy biscuits
Date: 2004-02-21 12:10 am (UTC)I'm ordinarily leery of accepting snacky things over the web anyway. You know, I'm trying to maintain my shinyblogs figure, which is, these days, a bit more roundy than shiny. Granted, it does have to be a bit more roundy than shiny from time to time, to contain all that raw shinyblogs cybermachismo I've got, but, still, sometimes I wonder that, if my figure gets too round, it'll affect the earth's gravitational pull on the rest of the universe, and suddenly the sun will start revolving around the earth, instead of the other way round, and the Catholic Church will suddenly have been right about something. And that'd just freak me out. Because, you know, if the Catholic Church was right about anything, there'd be a lot more people in hell. In which case, I'd've expected to have gotten a "wish you were here" postcard by now.
But, even leaving religious overtones aside, I generally avoid treats from wispy girls on pure self-preservational grounds. Because, you know, I do have a healthy case of beautyphobia (http://snipurl.com/beautyphobia), which causes me to eschew chewing on the deliciousnesses proffered by the ultra-babelicious.
So I rarely accept, say, cookies. (Although, from time to time, I will sneak a cookie from a webcam model. Because, you know, it's a pretty good bet that a webcam model's cookie will be low in calories. And it's hard to be that frightened by a camgirl when you're separated by 30 gallons of lubricant (http://snipurl.com/lubricant).)
But I do sort of want a bloggy biscuit now. I'll bet bloggy biscuits are great for dipping in coffee.
First sushi, then biscuits. You're just a caloric temptress, you are.
You know, ljmatch (http://www.ljmatch.com), which I feel dirty admitting I joined a couple days ago (even after that 30-gallons-of-lubricant link), really ought to have a "culinary compatibility" rating system.
Re: mmm, bloggy biscuits
Date: 2004-02-25 10:00 pm (UTC)But, can one _eat_ a biscuit meant for a blog, being that blogs are entirely made up of bits and bytes and such?
Electronic biscuits! (and they must also have no calories, being electronic, and non-digestable)
(cannibalistic model-types? Sheesh, now *I* am going to be afraid to talk to beautiful women. I don't _want_ to be emergency food rations!)
Re: mmm, bloggy biscuits
Date: 2004-02-26 12:48 pm (UTC)I s'pose you could fend them off with that fan. Pesky view-obscuring fan. Bad fan, no bosoms.
no subject
Date: 2004-03-03 01:51 pm (UTC)(and my gods, do you remember _everything_ you've written? I'm so impressed...)