I wonder if bloggy biscuits are Atkins-approved. I tend to doubt it.
I'm ordinarily leery of accepting snacky things over the web anyway. You know, I'm trying to maintain my shinyblogs figure, which is, these days, a bit more roundy than shiny. Granted, it does have to be a bit more roundy than shiny from time to time, to contain all that raw shinyblogs cybermachismo I've got, but, still, sometimes I wonder that, if my figure gets too round, it'll affect the earth's gravitational pull on the rest of the universe, and suddenly the sun will start revolving around the earth, instead of the other way round, and the Catholic Church will suddenly have been right about something. And that'd just freak me out. Because, you know, if the Catholic Church was right about anything, there'd be a lot more people in hell. In which case, I'd've expected to have gotten a "wish you were here" postcard by now.
But, even leaving religious overtones aside, I generally avoid treats from wispy girls on pure self-preservational grounds. Because, you know, I do have a healthy case of beautyphobia (http://snipurl.com/beautyphobia), which causes me to eschew chewing on the deliciousnesses proffered by the ultra-babelicious.
So I rarely accept, say, cookies. (Although, from time to time, I will sneak a cookie from a webcam model. Because, you know, it's a pretty good bet that a webcam model's cookie will be low in calories. And it's hard to be that frightened by a camgirl when you're separated by 30 gallons of lubricant (http://snipurl.com/lubricant).)
But I do sort of want a bloggy biscuit now. I'll bet bloggy biscuits are great for dipping in coffee.
First sushi, then biscuits. You're just a caloric temptress, you are.
You know, ljmatch (http://www.ljmatch.com), which I feel dirty admitting I joined a couple days ago (even after that 30-gallons-of-lubricant link), really ought to have a "culinary compatibility" rating system.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Re: mmm, bloggy biscuits
Date: 2004-02-21 12:10 am (UTC)I'm ordinarily leery of accepting snacky things over the web anyway. You know, I'm trying to maintain my shinyblogs figure, which is, these days, a bit more roundy than shiny. Granted, it does have to be a bit more roundy than shiny from time to time, to contain all that raw shinyblogs cybermachismo I've got, but, still, sometimes I wonder that, if my figure gets too round, it'll affect the earth's gravitational pull on the rest of the universe, and suddenly the sun will start revolving around the earth, instead of the other way round, and the Catholic Church will suddenly have been right about something. And that'd just freak me out. Because, you know, if the Catholic Church was right about anything, there'd be a lot more people in hell. In which case, I'd've expected to have gotten a "wish you were here" postcard by now.
But, even leaving religious overtones aside, I generally avoid treats from wispy girls on pure self-preservational grounds. Because, you know, I do have a healthy case of beautyphobia (http://snipurl.com/beautyphobia), which causes me to eschew chewing on the deliciousnesses proffered by the ultra-babelicious.
So I rarely accept, say, cookies. (Although, from time to time, I will sneak a cookie from a webcam model. Because, you know, it's a pretty good bet that a webcam model's cookie will be low in calories. And it's hard to be that frightened by a camgirl when you're separated by 30 gallons of lubricant (http://snipurl.com/lubricant).)
But I do sort of want a bloggy biscuit now. I'll bet bloggy biscuits are great for dipping in coffee.
First sushi, then biscuits. You're just a caloric temptress, you are.
You know, ljmatch (http://www.ljmatch.com), which I feel dirty admitting I joined a couple days ago (even after that 30-gallons-of-lubricant link), really ought to have a "culinary compatibility" rating system.