(no subject)

[wispfox]

Before I run home!

I really want a tactile and gustatorial fractal, with different sensations depending on the shape and color! Even better if there can be varying emotional flavorrs thrown in.

Want!

[edit: Or! Musical fractals!!!!!]

Comments

[wispfox.livejournal.com]

Shiny things to click on!

No, I don't mind you adding me. Indeed, your blog was entertaining enough (and infrequent enough to not overwhelm me) that I added you back.

Sushi fractals? Hmm... that sounds interesting!

Re:

[shinyblogs.livejournal.com]

Cool! Glad you find my blog entertaining. It is a bit infrequent, though. I'd update more often, but I tend to get writer's blog.

And I need a good blog to blog about.

[wispfox.livejournal.com]

*grins* Bad blog, no biscuit!

Re: mmm, bloggy biscuits

[shinyblogs.livejournal.com]

I wonder if bloggy biscuits are Atkins-approved. I tend to doubt it.

I'm ordinarily leery of accepting snacky things over the web anyway. You know, I'm trying to maintain my shinyblogs figure, which is, these days, a bit more roundy than shiny. Granted, it does have to be a bit more roundy than shiny from time to time, to contain all that raw shinyblogs cybermachismo I've got, but, still, sometimes I wonder that, if my figure gets too round, it'll affect the earth's gravitational pull on the rest of the universe, and suddenly the sun will start revolving around the earth, instead of the other way round, and the Catholic Church will suddenly have been right about something. And that'd just freak me out. Because, you know, if the Catholic Church was right about anything, there'd be a lot more people in hell. In which case, I'd've expected to have gotten a "wish you were here" postcard by now.

But, even leaving religious overtones aside, I generally avoid treats from wispy girls on pure self-preservational grounds. Because, you know, I do have a healthy case of beautyphobia (http://snipurl.com/beautyphobia), which causes me to eschew chewing on the deliciousnesses proffered by the ultra-babelicious.

So I rarely accept, say, cookies. (Although, from time to time, I will sneak a cookie from a webcam model. Because, you know, it's a pretty good bet that a webcam model's cookie will be low in calories. And it's hard to be that frightened by a camgirl when you're separated by 30 gallons of lubricant (http://snipurl.com/lubricant).)

But I do sort of want a bloggy biscuit now. I'll bet bloggy biscuits are great for dipping in coffee.

First sushi, then biscuits. You're just a caloric temptress, you are.

You know, ljmatch (http://www.ljmatch.com), which I feel dirty admitting I joined a couple days ago (even after that 30-gallons-of-lubricant link), really ought to have a "culinary compatibility" rating system.

Re: mmm, bloggy biscuits

[wispfox.livejournal.com]

Mmm. Bloggy biscuits.

But, can one _eat_ a biscuit meant for a blog, being that blogs are entirely made up of bits and bytes and such?

Electronic biscuits! (and they must also have no calories, being electronic, and non-digestable)

(cannibalistic model-types? Sheesh, now *I* am going to be afraid to talk to beautiful women. I don't _want_ to be emergency food rations!)

Re: mmm, bloggy biscuits

[shinyblogs.livejournal.com]

The emergency food rations concern is an issue. I mean, there's a real risk that a PCVM might look at your Feb. 16 post (http://www.livejournal.com/users/wispfox/144991.html#cutid1) and say "Mmm. Yummy." (In contrast to a true practitioner of woohoodoh (http://snipurl.com/woohoodoh), who would say "thproing! (http://www.livejournal.com/users/vivnsect/59507.html?thread=662643#t662643)"

I s'pose you could fend them off with that fan. Pesky view-obscuring fan. Bad fan, no bosoms.

[wispfox.livejournal.com]

Heh! It's a _good_ fan - although a horrible tease, of course. Not sharp, though - not much good against people who are hungry...

(and my gods, do you remember _everything_ you've written? I'm so impressed...)