wispfox: (Default)
[personal profile] wispfox
If I'm ranting on my LiveJournal, it's not aimed at anyone specific (with possible exception of highly visible public figures that I only know of, and don't personally know).

If I'm ranting, I'm also knowingly not taking into account other people's potential perspectives on the matter (if it were, it wouldn't be a rant according to my definition of 'rant').

Yeah. That.

(Incidentally, I will continue to attempt to remember to read/follow evites; they are just nearly certain to make me feel more or less how I felt in my previous post, at least as long as I'm thinking about them. I usually don't _say_ anything, but there was the most fascinating juxtaposition of having one arrive in my INBOX at the exact same time as answering an LJ poll on how I feel about them. I was already in a verbal mental state about them, so was in the right mindset to express my reaction to them, rather than simply have it and move on)

Date: 2005-03-21 11:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dancingwolfgrrl.livejournal.com
You could do it. I have total confidence.

Okay. A [rant.rant] might be a rant about rants, such as "Why is it that rants seem to inspire bad grammar?" Whereas [rant.meta] would be a rant about the act of ranting. For example, "ranting is a fruitless endeavor."

How's that? :)

November 2024

S M T W T F S
     12
3 456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 19th, 2026 11:56 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios