[work, odd]
Dec. 6th, 2004 01:25 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
wispfoxA conversation went from my hatred of diamond ads to gags (something about a diamond ad saying "Diamonds - Render Her Speechless"), and then I was no longer able to keep my thoughts work-safe.
I'm highly amused by this fact, really.
I'm highly amused by this fact, really.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
Diamonds are a Man's best Gimmick
Date: 2004-12-06 06:42 pm (UTC)innuendo parody of a diamond ad. I will have to dig up WHICH
episode it is attached to ..
Re: Diamonds are a Man's best Gimmick
Date: 2004-12-06 08:00 pm (UTC)Re: Diamonds are a Man's best Gimmick
Date: 2004-12-06 08:50 pm (UTC)From this (http://www.familyguyfiles.com/episodes/viewref.php?searchterm=De%20Beers&title=Peter,%20Peter,%20Caviar%20Eater&id=8&op=and) epsiode guide:
"Probably one of the best gags on the show is a spoof of the De Beers Diamond Company commercials which feature people giving each other jewelery - but behind a curtain so you only see the shadows of people, but the ring is always visible. In the gag, we see a man and woman kissing (apparently she just got a ring), then she begins to go down on him (apparently to perform oral sex). The screen then shows - DIAMONDS SHE'LL PRETTY MUCH HAVE TO. Of special note; Seth and the censors actually went frame by frame trimming to get this gag on the air - apparently there is "too far down" for Network TV. In the end, it still worked."
Re: Diamonds are a Man's best Gimmick
Date: 2004-12-07 05:20 pm (UTC)Nifty. :)
no subject
Date: 2004-12-06 06:50 pm (UTC)like, fer sure.
(my favorite is still the "ringwraiths in love" ad; even though as far as i can tell diamonds are basically a scam...)
no subject
Date: 2004-12-06 07:59 pm (UTC)Besides, they're _boring_!
no subject
Date: 2004-12-06 08:55 pm (UTC)describes my day to a 'T', there. *nod*
no subject
Date: 2004-12-06 08:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-12-06 09:06 pm (UTC)particularly strong today, though. 'specially while i was in class. geez.
no subject
Date: 2004-12-06 09:38 pm (UTC)That's why I wondered! :)
particularly strong today, though. 'specially while i was in class. geez.
Fun. No concentration on the task at hand for _you_!
no subject
Date: 2004-12-06 09:51 pm (UTC)also, yum.
no subject
Date: 2004-12-06 09:54 pm (UTC)And confused by random yumness, but offering icon for yum purposes. ;)
no subject
Date: 2004-12-06 10:04 pm (UTC)but thanks for distracting me further. :)
no subject
Date: 2004-12-07 05:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-12-07 01:15 am (UTC)