(no subject)
Feb. 26th, 2004 10:50 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
wispfoxSeen in multiple locations:
a safe-for-work advertisement in Brazil for lubricant. Impressive, really.
a safe-for-work advertisement in Brazil for lubricant. Impressive, really.
wispfoxwispfox
Page Summary
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
Active Entries
Style Credit
- Style: by timeasmymeasure
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2004-02-26 03:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-02-26 04:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-02-26 04:24 pm (UTC)Ah, lube . . .
Date: 2004-02-27 01:09 am (UTC)As for the placement of the post, kinda reminds me of those little crotch-height XXX poles they have in Amsterdam, which is just wrong on oodles of levels.
BTW,
I envy.
Re: Ah, lube . . .
Date: 2004-02-27 04:32 am (UTC)I like your writing, btw. :)
Re: Ah, lube . . .
Date: 2004-02-27 05:16 am (UTC)And as for services . . . I totally crave icon services.
My current icon, the tipsy-kitten-in-a-basket has only just recently been borrowed from
But I'd love to have some form of icon that actually played on the concept of "shiny blogs". Especially something animated. Like somebody waxing a big shiny "BLOG" with little "shiny"s sparkling off it. I also wish I had something like this:
but with "shiny" instead of "pretty". (Isn't it cute, though? I don't know who the original creator was, so I don't know who to beg for permission to use it.)
Ooh, or a pack of vegetarian supermodels springing through a window to eat a hapless bygawker as he points and goes "ooh! shiny!" Only that'd be kinda twisted. And tough to make in 40k or less . . .
But, really, if there's anything you spot in my blog that makes you think "Oh, I could make something that'd fit that," I'd be delighted to see it, animated or not.
Re: Ah, lube . . .
Date: 2004-02-27 05:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-02-27 06:31 pm (UTC)Oh! See, I haven't actually praised your writing, I don't think, but I enjoy it. It's really funny. :)
Ooh, or a pack of vegetarian supermodels springing through a window to eat a hapless bygawker as he points and goes "ooh! shiny!" Only that'd be kinda twisted. And tough to make in 40k or less . . .
If anyone can make you that, the degree to which it would be appropriate is just... amazing. I want to _see_ that! Icon or otherwise, actually.
Icon or otherwise???
Date: 2004-02-28 04:59 am (UTC)And maybe Uma Thurman.
Ooh-mmm-ahhh Thurman.
Now there's a girl with mithril buttocks.
Re: Icon or otherwise???
Date: 2004-03-01 01:15 am (UTC)vegetarian supermodels .........
Date: 2004-02-28 05:35 am (UTC)Re: vegetarian supermodels .........
Date: 2004-02-28 05:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-03-01 04:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-03-01 04:59 pm (UTC)heehee
Date: 2004-03-08 09:39 pm (UTC)Re: Ah, lube . . .
Date: 2004-04-19 09:21 pm (UTC)Sorry about the delay. It's your very own... umm... something. :)
It'll look really terrible on a dark background. If it's a problem, let me know? :)
Re: Ah, lube . . .
Date: 2004-02-28 05:03 am (UTC)Re: Ah, lube . . .
Date: 2004-02-28 05:40 am (UTC)Re: Ah, lube . . .
Date: 2004-02-28 05:41 am (UTC)*cackle*
Date: 2004-02-26 04:03 pm (UTC)Doesn't work visually for me
Date: 2004-02-26 04:28 pm (UTC)Re: Doesn't work visually for me
Date: 2004-02-26 06:06 pm (UTC)*gets it*
no subject
Date: 2004-02-26 04:43 pm (UTC)I bet it has other uses too - for example - drilling various types of wells.
no subject
Date: 2004-02-26 05:09 pm (UTC)