(no subject)

[wispfox]

I apparently don't use the mood indicator _nearly_ often enough:

http://ion9.com/mood.php?username=wispfox

Comments

Oh shiny!

[majes.livejournal.com]

New toy, new toy! Must play with...

[mcsnee.livejournal.com]

I think I win, though. :D

http://ion9.com/mood.php?username=mcsnee

[cos]

What's enough? I've never used it :)

[wispfox.livejournal.com]

Enough to make that tool actually useful? ;)

[wispfox.livejournal.com]

You have _one_ mood!

*laughs*

[ladytabitha.livejournal.com]

Holysheet!

You should so see if you can make that into a usericon.

Re: mood indicator

[wolfieboy.livejournal.com]

I'm pleased that the only moods that I have more that once are: thoughtful, pleased, amused, loved, working, energetic, and tired. The first one listed as a single is 'logophilic'...

Re: Oh shiny!

[bridgetester.livejournal.com]

I like your train of thought.

[moosemonster.livejournal.com]

I always figured that a writer's mood was to be inferred (if at all) from the writing, rather than a single word, which seems a rather coarse and inadequate way to describe the state of something as subtle and complicated as a mind.

Have you found that your state of mind tends to change, from what it was at the start of a post to the end?

[wispfox.livejournal.com]

Have you found that your state of mind tends to change, from what it was at the start of a post to the end?

If it's a fairly long and/or introspective post, yes, absolutely. But those tend to be the ones that _do_ get a mood setting, amusingly enough.