wispfox: (insane)
wispfox ([personal profile] wispfox) wrote2007-09-17 04:52 pm

Random bits of glee

Co-worker offering to explain something in harmony on Friday because my brain was too fried to parse what he was saying. This, perhaps not shockingly, caused a response of 'Hell, yes! I don't care _what_ is to be explained, if someone offers to explain it in harmony (or, for that matter, interpretive dance), I _will_ say yes!'

Sadly, there was no actual harmony explanation (perhaps because there was too much laughter).

You know I have corrupted people's brains when...

They mis-read 'New Scientist' as 'Mad Scientist', and think it would have made complete sense the way they misread it, since it was in my apartment.

They mis-read 'weird conversion' as 'weird conversation' repeatedly.

Mua-ha-ha-ha!

[identity profile] australian-joe.livejournal.com 2007-09-18 02:20 pm (UTC)(link)
One day I shall propose communicating in interpretative dance, and you will insist on it, and I will be in a lot of trouble.

... mind you, it could be worth it. [imagining]

[identity profile] wispfox.livejournal.com 2007-09-18 03:11 pm (UTC)(link)
Dude.

YOU SHOULD DO THIS. If nothing else, I would certainly be stuck giggling for some number of minutes. And then periodically for as long as I randomly recall the experience.

[identity profile] metahacker.livejournal.com 2007-09-20 05:15 pm (UTC)(link)
Clearly you need to explain interpretive dance, using interpretive dance...

[identity profile] australian-joe.livejournal.com 2007-09-20 10:33 pm (UTC)(link)
I don't think I know how to dance recursively...

[identity profile] wispfox.livejournal.com 2007-09-21 02:12 pm (UTC)(link)
But you figured out recursion because of the Count! I bet you can figure it out. ;)

[identity profile] australian-joe.livejournal.com 2007-09-21 02:29 pm (UTC)(link)
Maaaybe.