Harem, in my head, implies things like there being a lack of equality. And that I'm supporting them. And that there is more defined relationship structure than there was in australian_joe's definition of such (see my reply to ratatosk for that). randysmith's definition is just funny. :)
By their definitions? Sure, I do. But by my interpretation of the word? No, I don't.
Ah! My definition (and, I suspect, jasra's, though I can't speak for her) doesn't imply support or lack of equality. Just lots of happy people being schtupped by the wispfox.
Depending on your definition of 'schtupped', that is not, actually, what was meant by harem. Kissing with on-going mutual interest in more was the original definition. :) *points to later post*
My defintion is more like australian_joe's. It's definitely not a lack of equality... I think it's the shifting group of people who feel affection of varying levels toward you (and probably toward each other 'cause they're all just nifty people).
I think it's the shifting group of people who feel affection of varying levels toward you (and probably toward each other 'cause they're all just nifty people).
I think _that_ probably better approximates randysmith's original definition, before he realized that he'd not quite defined it as he'd intended. But, yes. :)
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
No?
Harem, in my head, implies things like there being a lack of equality. And that I'm supporting them. And that there is more defined relationship structure than there was in
By their definitions? Sure, I do. But by my interpretation of the word? No, I don't.
no subject
no subject
But, yes.
no subject
no subject
I think _that_ probably better approximates
no subject
no subject
no subject