wispfox: (Default)
wispfox ([personal profile] wispfox) wrote2004-10-05 05:16 pm
  • Add Memory
  • Share This Entry

[politics]

Someone needs to convince me that this article is wrong.
Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

[identity profile] aussie-nyc.livejournal.com 2004-10-05 09:23 pm (UTC)(link)
Snopes has a take on it. (http://www.snopes.com/politics/military/draft.asp)

[identity profile] wispfox.livejournal.com 2004-10-05 09:25 pm (UTC)(link)
Thank you! For some reason, I can never remember _where_ it is that debunks things, only that such things exist.

[identity profile] bridgetester.livejournal.com 2004-10-05 10:11 pm (UTC)(link)
Beat me to it! ;)

[identity profile] uberjay.livejournal.com 2004-10-05 10:17 pm (UTC)(link)
Yeah. Our Fearless Leader also claimed (during the debate) that the military would remain 100% volunteer. So, at least he'd be in deep shit if that ended up not being the case...

sigh.

[identity profile] sunspiral.livejournal.com 2004-10-06 05:11 am (UTC)(link)
No, because the fuckwits who'd vote for him will just continue believing him no matter how many times he changes his story.

[identity profile] bridgetester.livejournal.com 2004-10-06 06:19 pm (UTC)(link)
Well, the House fixed the rumor (http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/10/06/draft.ap/index.html)

[identity profile] bridgetester.livejournal.com 2004-10-06 09:35 pm (UTC)(link)
They do good things sometimes.
Flat | Top-Level Comments Only